Re: [PATCHv2 2/4] edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
From: Dinh Nguyen
Date: Thu Jun 04 2015 - 11:32:42 EST
On 06/04/2015 09:28 AM, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The Arria10 SOC uses a completely different SDRAM controller from the
> earlier CycloneV and ArriaV SoCs. This patch abstracts the SDRAM bits
> for the CycloneV/ArriaV SoCs in preparation for the Arria10 support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Make c5_data static.
> ---
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> drivers/edac/altera_edac.h | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> index a9e7c69..a8350f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
What branch are you basing this patch on? I get the following error when
applied to both v4.1-rc6, linux-next, and linux-edac/linux-next.
Applying: edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
error: patch failed: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:400
error: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
Dinh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/