On 2015/06/05 1:22, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On 6/4/15 7:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
So if users cannot actually generate .o files then it's premature to merge this in# perf record -e bpf_source.c cmdline
to create a eBPF filter from source,
Use
# perf record -e bpf_object.o cmdline
to create a eBPF filter from object intermedia.
Use
# perf bpf compile bpf_source.c --kbuild=kernel-build-dir -o bpf_object.o
to create the .o
I think this should be enough. Currently only the second case has been implemented.
such an incomplete form!
It should be possible to use a feature that we are merging.
of course it's usable :) There is some confusion here.
To compile .c into .o one can easily use
clang -O2 -emit-llvm -c file.c -o - | llc -march=bpf -o file.o
any version of clang is ok,
llc needs to be fresh with bpf backend.
For a lot of cases kernel headers are not needed, so above
will work fine.
For our TC examples we recommend to use 'bcc' alias:
bcc() {
clang -O2 -emit-llvm -c $1 -o - | llc -march=bpf -filetype=obj -o
"`basename $1 .c`.o"
}
then compiling as easy as 'bcc file.c'
What Wang mentioned that we're working on is fully integrated 'bcc'.
It will use clang/llvm as libraries, so no intermediate steps will
be needed, but some folks will always have concerns about
ultra-embedded environments where even 20Mb of libllvm.so is too much.
So I think we need to support both 'perf record -e file.[co]'
I think we'd better make 'perf record -e file.c' default and '-e file.o'
should be an option.