Re: [PATCH 1/4] locking/rtmutex: Implement lockless top-waiter wakeup

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 19 May 2015, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

> Mark the task for later wakeup after the wait_lock has been released.
> This way, once the next task is awoken, it will have a better chance
> to of finding the wait_lock free when continuing executing in
> __rt_mutex_slowlock() when trying to acquire the rtmutex, calling
> try_to_take_rt_mutex(). Upon contended scenarios, other tasks attempting
> take the lock may acquire it first, right after the wait_lock is released,
> but (a) this can also occur with the current code, as it relies on the
> spinlock fairness, and (b) we are dealing with the top-waiter anyway,
> so it will always take the lock next.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/