[PATCH v2] perf: honoring the architectural performance monitoring version

From: Imre Palik
Date: Fri Jun 05 2015 - 11:29:10 EST


From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@xxxxxxxxx>

Architectural performance monitoring version 1 doesn't support fixed
counters. Currently, even if a hypervisor advertises support for
architectural performance monitoring version 1, perf may still tries to use
the fixed counters, as the constraints are set up based on the CPU model.

This patch ensures that perf honors the architectural performance
monitoring version returned by CPUID, and it only uses the fixed counters
for version two and above.

Some of the ideas in this patch are coming from Peter Zijlstra.

Signed-off-by: Imre Palik <imrep@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 3998131..bde66aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
for_each_event_constraint(c, x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
if ((event->hw.config & c->cmask) == c->code) {
event->hw.flags |= c->flags;
- return c;
+ return c->idxmsk64 ? c : NULL;
}
}
}
@@ -3341,9 +3341,12 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
for_each_event_constraint(c, x86_pmu.event_constraints) {
if (c->cmask != FIXED_EVENT_FLAGS
|| c->idxmsk64 == INTEL_PMC_MSK_FIXED_REF_CYCLES) {
+ c->idxmsk64 &=
+ ~(~0UL << (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed));
continue;
}
-
+ c->idxmsk64 &=
+ ~(~0UL << (INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED + x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed));
c->idxmsk64 |= (1ULL << x86_pmu.num_counters) - 1;
c->weight += x86_pmu.num_counters;
}
--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/