Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH] dlm: remove unnecessary error check
From: Bob Peterson
Date: Tue Jun 09 2015 - 08:09:24 EST
----- Original Message -----
> We don't need the redundant logic since send_message always returns 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/dlm/lock.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> index 35502d4..6fc3de9 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> @@ -3656,10 +3656,7 @@ static int send_common(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct
> dlm_lkb *lkb, int mstype)
>
> send_args(r, lkb, ms);
>
> - error = send_message(mh, ms);
> - if (error)
> - goto fail;
> - return 0;
> + return send_message(mh, ms);
>
> fail:
> remove_from_waiters(lkb, msg_reply_type(mstype));
> @@ -3763,10 +3760,7 @@ static int send_lookup(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct
> dlm_lkb *lkb)
>
> send_args(r, lkb, ms);
>
> - error = send_message(mh, ms);
> - if (error)
> - goto fail;
> - return 0;
> + return send_message(mh, ms);
>
> fail:
> remove_from_waiters(lkb, DLM_MSG_LOOKUP_REPLY);
> --
> 1.7.12.4
Hi,
The patch looks okay, but if remove_from_waiters() always returns 0,
wouldn't it be better to change the function from int to void and
return 0 here? The advantage is that code spelunkers wouldn't need
to back-track one more level (not to mention the instruction or two
it might save).
Regards,
Bob Peterson
Red Hat File Systems
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/