Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] block: loop: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES for request queue of loop

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Jun 10 2015 - 03:36:16 EST

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH] oom: split out forced OOM killer"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/qrwlock: Don't contend with readers when setting _QW_WAITING"
In reply to: Ming Lei: "[PATCH v5 2/5] block: loop: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES for request queue of loop"
Next in thread: Ming Lei: "[PATCH v5 3/5] block: loop: use kthread_work"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:49:23PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to enable merge because the I/O
> submitted to backing file is handled page by page.

Looks fine, but does it make any difference?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [PATCH] oom: split out forced OOM killer"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] locking/qrwlock: Don't contend with readers when setting _QW_WAITING"
In reply to: Ming Lei: "[PATCH v5 2/5] block: loop: set QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES for request queue of loop"
Next in thread: Ming Lei: "[PATCH v5 3/5] block: loop: use kthread_work"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]