Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] x86/asm: Compile-time asm code validation

[Josh Poimboeuf]

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:31:55AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 05:04:12PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's not needed, but it's an optimization to optimize icache usage.
> > It is optional (-freorder-blocks-and-partition)
> > 
> > In this case gcc splits the function into two (hot and cold)
> > 
> > It's actually a nice optimization and it would be sad from stopping
> > the kernel from using it.
> 
> Sorry if I wasn't clear, I was trying to ask for examples in kernel asm
> code.
> 
> Are you suggesting that we implement this gcc optimization in kernel asm
> code?

If you're wanting something like -freorder-blocks-and-partition for asm
code, maybe we could implement something analagous to the
likely()/unlikely() macros, to allow the hot and cold portions to be
placed into different sections.  (I could then teach asmvalidate how to
validate such code.)

Would that be useful?

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/