Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] block: make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily sized bios

[Ming Lin]

On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 15:06 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 10 2015 at  5:20pm -0400,
> > Ming Lin <mlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Ming Lin <mlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 17:06 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> >> We need to test on large HW raid setups like a Netapp filer (or even
> >> >> local SAS drives connected via some SAS controller).  Like a 8+2 drive
> >> >> RAID6 or 8+1 RAID5 setup.  Testing with MD raid on JBOD setups with 8
> >> >> devices is also useful.  It is larger RAID setups that will be more
> >> >> sensitive to IO sizes being properly aligned on RAID stripe and/or chunk
> >> >> size boundaries.
> >> >
> >> > Here are tests results of xfs/ext4/btrfs read/write on HW RAID6/MD RAID6/DM stripe target.
> >> > Each case run 0.5 hour, so it took 36 hours to finish all the tests on 4.1-rc4 and 4.1-rc4-patched kernels.
> >> >
> >> > No performance regressions were introduced.
> >> >
> >> > Test server: Dell R730xd(2 sockets/48 logical cpus/264G memory)
> >> > HW RAID6/MD RAID6/DM stripe target were configured with 10 HDDs, each 280G
> >> > Stripe size 64k and 128k were tested.
> >> >
> >> > devs="/dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/sdf /dev/sdg /dev/sdh /dev/sdi /dev/sdj /dev/sdk"
> >> > spare_devs="/dev/sdl /dev/sdm"
> >> > stripe_size=64 (or 128)
> >> >
> >> > MD RAID6 was created by:
> >> > mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=6 --raid-devices=10 $devs --spare-devices=2 $spare_devs -c $stripe_size
> >> >
> >> > DM stripe target was created by:
> >> > pvcreate $devs
> >> > vgcreate striped_vol_group $devs
> >> > lvcreate -i10 -I${stripe_size} -L2T -nstriped_logical_volume striped_vol_group
> >
> > DM had a regression relative to merge_bvec that wasn't fixed until
> > recently (it wasn't in 4.1-rc4), see commit 1c220c69ce0 ("dm: fix
> > casting bug in dm_merge_bvec()").  It was introduced in 4.1.
> >
> > So your 4.1-rc4 DM stripe testing may have effectively been with
> > merge_bvec disabled.
> 
> I'l rebase it to latest Linus tree and re-run DM stripe testing.

Here is the results for 4.1-rc7. Also looks good.

5. DM: stripe size 64k
		4.1-rc7		4.1-rc7-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	784.0		783.5  -0.06%
xfs write:	751.8		768.8  +2.26%
ext4 read:	837.0		832.3  -0.56%
ext4 write:	806.8		814.3  +0.92%
btrfs read:	787.5		786.1  -0.17%
btrfs write:	722.8		718.7  -0.56%


6. DM: stripe size 128k
		4.1-rc7		4.1-rc7-patched
		-------		---------------
		(MB/s)		(MB/s)
xfs read:	1045.5		1068.8  +2.22%
xfs write:	1058.9		1052.7  -0.58%
ext4 read:	1001.8		1020.7  +1.88%
ext4 write:	1049.9		1053.7  +0.36%
btrfs read:	1082.8		1084.8  +0.18%
btrfs write:	948.15		948.74  +0.06%


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/