Re: [PATCH] x86: General protection fault after STR (32 bit systems only)

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Jun 12 2015 - 03:50:30 EST



* Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_32.S
> > @@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ ENTRY(do_suspend_lowlevel)
> > jmp ret_point
> > .p2align 4,,7
> > ret_point:
> > + /* In case the BIOS corrupted DS, make the kernel context minimally functional: */
> > + movl $__KERNEL_DS, %eax
> > + movl %eax, %ds
> > +
>
> On further thought, I think you want movl $__USER_DS, %eax. The
> 32-bit kernel is a strange beast. Also, you should probably fix up
> %es as well.

So restore_processor_state() already restores ES. The idea here was to reload DS
early on, because the kernel implicitly uses it for data access so we need it to
be good to be able to continue executing any generic kernel code.

We don't use %es: prefixed assembly AFAICS, what are the implicit users of ES?

Also, to further confuse things, we also have:

ENTRY(wakeup_pmode_return)
wakeup_pmode_return:
movw $__KERNEL_DS, %ax
movw %ax, %ss
movw %ax, %ds
movw %ax, %es
movw %ax, %fs
movw %ax, %gs

# reload the gdt, as we need the full 32 bit address
lidt saved_idt
lldt saved_ldt
ljmp $(__KERNEL_CS), $1f
1:
movl %cr3, %eax
movl %eax, %cr3
wbinvd

which seems to be another layer of restoration - but it possibly does not trigger
in the S2RAM case here.

Oh, funny the 'reload the gdt' comment: do you see an LGDT there? It reloads all
segment selectors, the IDT, LDT and CR3, but does not seem to reload the GDT - the
only thing the comment describes.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/