Re: [PATCH] i2c: octeon: remove unused signal handling

[Alexander Sverdlin]

Hi!

On 11/06/15 16:12, ext Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> 'commit 2637e5fd232d ("i2c: octeon: Fix i2c fail problem when a process is
> terminated by a signal")' removed the wait_event_interruptible_timeout to 
> prevent half/mixed i2c messages from being sent/recievd but forgot to 
> drop the signal handling case in the return handling. This just removes 
> this dead code. While at it the return variable is adjusted to the type 
> expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@xxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
> V2: Thanks to Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> for clarifying the intent
>     (and how I should have found this by properly checking the git log).
> 
> Patch was compile tested with cavium_octeon_defconfig
> (implies CONFIG_I2C_OCTEON=y)
> 
> Patch is against 4.1-rc7 (localversion-next is -next-20150611)
> 
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c |    7 ++-----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c
> index 6e75e01..32914ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_test_iflg(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
>   */
>  static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
>  {
> -	int result;
> +	long result;
>  
>  	octeon_i2c_int_enable(i2c);
>  
> @@ -210,10 +210,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon_i2c *i2c)
>  
>  	octeon_i2c_int_disable(i2c);
>  
> -	if (result < 0) {
> -		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "%s: wait interrupted\n", __func__);
> -		return result;
> -	} else if (result == 0) {
> +	if (result == 0) {
>  		dev_dbg(i2c->dev, "%s: timeout\n", __func__);
>  		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}

-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Sverdlin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/