Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: X-Gene: Disable Configuration Request Retry Status for X-Gene v1 PCIe
From: Duc Dang
Date: Fri Jun 12 2015 - 18:10:49 EST
Hi Bjorn,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Duc,
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:08:14PM -0700, Duc Dang wrote:
>> X-Gene v1 PCIe controller has a bug in Configuration Request Retry
>> Status (CRS) logic:
>> When CPU tries to read Vendor ID and Device ID of not-existed
>> remote device, the controller returns 0xFFFF0001 instead of
>> 0xFFFFFFFF; this will add significant delay in boot time as
>> pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id will wait for 60 seconds before
>> giving up.
>
> OK, help me understand how this works. I think this is related to the
> problem I reported where if the slot is empty, "lspci" doesn't show
> anything, not even the Root Port leading to the slot.
>
> I think this happens because when we try to read the Root Port's config
> space,
>
> - the slot below the Root Port is empty
> - the Root Port's link is down
> - xgene_pcie_map_bus() returns NULL because !port->link_up
> - pci_generic_config_read32() returns PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND
>
> so it looks like the Root Port itself doesn't exist.
>
> I proposed to change xgene_pcie_map_bus() so it didn't check whether the
> link was up. That change makes reads of the Root Port's config space work.
>
> After we learn the Root Port exists, the PCI core enumerates devices below
> the Root Port, e.g., on bus 01. X-Gene advertises that it supports CRS, so
> we enable it. When we try to read the Vendor ID of 01:00.0, there's no
> response from the device (because the slot is empty), and the Root Complex
> should complete the read by fabricating data of all ones, i.e., 0xFFFFFFFF.
> But apparently X-Gene supplies 0xFFFF0001 instead, which means "there's a
> device here, but it's not ready yet," so the PCI core retries the read for
> 60 seconds before timing out.
>
> This patch is basically a quirk that keeps X-Gene from advertising CRS
> support, so the PCI core won't enable CRS. In the example above, I guess
> that means the Root Complex will supply 0xFFFFFFFF and the core will see
> that the slot is empty.
>
> But this patch leaves the "!port->link_up" test in xgene_pcie_map_bus().
> Doesn't that mean the core will still not discover the Root Port when the
> slot is empty?
>
> It seems to me that you would want both the xgene_pcie_map_bus() change and
> this patch. The first would fix the problem that we don't enumerate Root
> Ports leading to empty slots, and the second would fix the problem that we
> enable CRS and timeout when enumerating below those Root Ports.
>
Yes, you are right. I plan to send a follow up patch after this one to
remove the port->link_up check in xgene_pcie_map_bus and make root
port discoverable even when the slot is empty. I can combine this
follow up patch with this one if you feel OK with it.
> One more question below:
>
>> So for X-Gene v1 PCIe controllers, disable CRS capability
>> advertisement by clearing CRS Software Visibility bit before
>> returning the Root Capability value to the callers. This is done
>> by implementing X-Gene PCIe specific xgene_pcie_config_read32 for
>> CFG read accesses to replace the generic default pci_generic_config_read32
>> function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Duc Dang <dhdang@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c
>> index ee082c0..741a253 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xgene.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@
>> #define SZ_1T (SZ_1G*1024ULL)
>> #define PIPE_PHY_RATE_RD(src) ((0xc000 & (u32)(src)) >> 0xe)
>>
>> +#define ROOT_CAP_AND_CTRL 0x5C
>> +
>> +/* PCIe IP version */
>> +#define XGENE_PCIE_IP_VER_UNKN 0
>> +#define XGENE_PCIE_IP_VER_1 1
>> +
>> struct xgene_pcie_port {
>> struct device_node *node;
>> struct device *dev;
>> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@ struct xgene_pcie_port {
>> void __iomem *cfg_base;
>> unsigned long cfg_addr;
>> bool link_up;
>> + u32 version;
>> };
>>
>> static inline u32 pcie_bar_low_val(u32 addr, u32 flags)
>> @@ -140,9 +147,44 @@ static void __iomem *xgene_pcie_map_bus(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>> return xgene_pcie_get_cfg_base(bus) + offset;
>> }
>>
>> +int xgene_pcie_config_read32(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
>> + int where, int size, u32 *val)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *addr;
>> + struct xgene_pcie_port *port = bus->sysdata;
>> +
>> + addr = bus->ops->map_bus(bus, devfn, where & ~0x3);
>> + if (!addr) {
>> + *val = ~0;
>> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *val = readl(addr);
>
> Can't you just call pci_generic_config_read32() directly instead of
> duplicating its code here?
>
Yes, I will replace above code with:
pci_generic_config_read32(bus, devfn, where & ~0x3, 4, *val)
to read 4 bytes to *val;
>> + /*
>> + * X-Gene v1 PCIe controller has a bug in Configuration Request
>> + * Retry Status (CRS) logic:
>> + * When CPU tries to read Vendor ID and Device ID of not-existed
>> + * remote device, the controller returns 0xFFFF0001 instead of
>> + * 0xFFFFFFFF; this will add significant delay in boot time as
>> + * pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id will wait for 60 seconds before
>> + * giving up.
>> + * So for X-Gene v1 PCIe controllers, disable CRS capability
>> + * advertisement by clearing CRS Software Visibility bit before
>> + * returning the Root Capability value to the callers.
>> + */
>> + if (pci_is_root_bus(bus) && (port->version == XGENE_PCIE_IP_VER_1) &&
>> + ((where & ~0x3) == ROOT_CAP_AND_CTRL))
>> + *val &= ~(PCI_EXP_RTCAP_CRSVIS << 16);
>> +
>> + if (size <= 2)
>> + *val = (*val >> (8 * (where & 3))) & ((1 << (size * 8)) - 1);
>> +
>> + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
>> +}
>> +
>> static struct pci_ops xgene_pcie_ops = {
>> .map_bus = xgene_pcie_map_bus,
>> - .read = pci_generic_config_read32,
>> + .read = xgene_pcie_config_read32,
>> .write = pci_generic_config_write32,
>> };
>>
>> @@ -483,6 +525,10 @@ static int xgene_pcie_probe_bridge(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> port->node = of_node_get(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> port->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>
>> + port->version = XGENE_PCIE_IP_VER_UNKN;
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(port->node, "apm,xgene-pcie"))
>> + port->version = XGENE_PCIE_IP_VER_1;
>> +
>> ret = xgene_pcie_map_reg(port, pdev);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
--
Regards,
Duc Dang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/