Re: [PATCH v2] x86/asm/entry/32, selftests: Add test_syscall_vdso test

[Denys Vlasenko]

On 06/13/2015 08:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> The test is fairly simplistic: it checks that all registers
>> are preserved across 32-bit syscall via VDSO.
>>
>> Run-tested:
>>
>> $ ./test_syscall_vdso_32
>> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via VDSO
>> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
>> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via INT 80
>> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
>> [RUN]	Running tests under ptrace
>> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via VDSO
>> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
>> [RUN]	Executing 6-argument 32-bit syscall via INT 80
>> [Ok]	Arguments are preserved across syscall
> 
> Just curious: is there a kernel sha1 where this test would fail? Or did you try to 
> provoke an information leak perhaps?

I did see failures, more than once, when testing my own patches.

I'm not aware of released kernels which are buggy wrt this test.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/