Re: [PATCH 1/3] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 11:49:16PM -0600, Sagar Dharia wrote:

> +static int slim_compare_eaddr(struct slim_eaddr *a, struct slim_eaddr *b)
> +{
> +	if (a->manf_id == b->manf_id && a->prod_code == b->prod_code &&
> +			a->dev_index == b->dev_index &&
> +			a->instance == b->instance)
> +		return 0;
> +	return -EIO;
> +}

-EIO?  That seems a bit random.

> +static int slim_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
> +
> +	if (pm)
> +		return pm_generic_resume(dev);
> +	else
> +		return 0;
> +}

I'm really surprised this needs to be open coded, none of this
references anything Slimbus specific.  Why not fix the need for open
coding?

There's also a bunch of other ops like poweroff and freeze/thaw that
you're not doing anything with.

> +void slim_ctrl_add_boarddevs(struct slim_controller *ctrl)
> +{

Why are these operations split?

> + * @reset_device: This callback is called after framer is booted.
> + *		Driver should do the needful to reset the device,
> + *		so that device acquires sync and be operational.

boot_device or init_device perhaps?  Reset sounds like it takes a
running device and resets it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature