Re: [PATCH 17/20] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue() API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

[Sreekanth Reddy]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:35 AM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 16:26 +0530, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On 06/12/2015 05:42 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>> > ...
>> >> +#if defined(alloc_ordered_workqueue)
>> >> +     ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
>> >> +             ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>> >> +#else
>> >> +             ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
>> >>           ioc->firmware_event_name);
>> >> +#endif
>> >
>> > Hi Sreekanth,
>> >
>> > I think the upstream version of this code can safely assume
>> > alloc_ordered_workqueue is defined, no?
>>
>> yes, upstream version of this code can safely assume that
>> alloc_ordered_workqueue is defined.
>>
>> While working in-house, I observed that some of the older kernels
>> doesn't defined this macro, so I have added this else section.
>
> The driver has to be defined for the current kernel.  If you maintain a
> backport, that's fine, but not in the upstream driver.  The reasons are
> fairly pragmatic: this code in the #else clause can't be compiled so
> it's just junk to the upstream driver and the static checkers will find
> it and you'll attract a flock of patches removing dead code.
>
Accepted. I will post next version of this patch by removing the else section.

Thanks,
Sreekanth


> James
>
>



-- 

Regards,
Sreekanth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/