Re: call_rcu from trace_preempt

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On 6/15/15 11:06 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > with the above 'fix' the trace.patch is now passing.
> It still crashes for me with the original test program
>
> [  145.908013]  [<ffffffff810d1da1>] ? __rcu_reclaim+0x101/0x3d0
> [  145.908013]  [<ffffffff810d1ca0>] ? rcu_barrier_func+0x250/0x250
> [  145.908013]  [<ffffffff810abc03>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf3/0x240
> [  145.908013]  [<ffffffff810d9afa>] rcu_do_batch+0x2ea/0x6b0

yes. full bpf test still crashes.
That's why I said trace.patch is passing ;)
There is something else in there. One 'fix' at a time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/