Re: [PATCH 01/10] cpumask: Introduce cpumask_any_online_but

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:17:08AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> > > +	cpumask_and(&tmp, cpu_online_mask, mask);
> > > +	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &tmp);
> > > +	return cpumask_any(&tmp);
> > > +}
> > 
> > You had a good example in cpumask_any_but() copy that.
> 
> I saw the cpumask_any_but but wanted to avoid the for loop in the
> cpumask_any_but , but now i see why from your previous comment. Without the
> cpumask_t I will have to use the cpumask_any_but .. the two were related.

It can be done w/o a loop. Hint, you need a static cpumask in your
code anyway.

Thanks

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/