Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] sched:Consider imbalance_pct when comparing loads in numa_has_capacity
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Tue Jun 16 2015 - 10:39:26 EST
On 06/16/2015 07:56 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> This is consistent with all other load balancing instances where we
> absorb unfairness upto env->imbalance_pct. Absorbing unfairness upto
> env->imbalance_pct allows to pull and retain task to their preferred
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
How does this work with other workloads, eg.
single instance SPECjbb2005, or two SPECjbb2005
instances on a four node system?
Is the load still balanced evenly between nodes
with this patch?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/