[PATCH 2/3] kdbus: optimize error path in kdbus_reply_new()

From: Sergei Zviagintsev
Date: Wed Jun 17 2015 - 13:15:48 EST


Move cleanup code to separate location as it never executes on normal
flow. This removes extra if-block and the need to initialize `ret'.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@xxxxxxxx>
---
ipc/kdbus/reply.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/kdbus/reply.c b/ipc/kdbus/reply.c
index 9d823ebee71f..e6791d86ec92 100644
--- a/ipc/kdbus/reply.c
+++ b/ipc/kdbus/reply.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct kdbus_reply *kdbus_reply_new(struct kdbus_conn *reply_src,
bool sync)
{
struct kdbus_reply *r;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;

if (atomic_inc_return(&reply_dst->request_count) >
KDBUS_CONN_MAX_REQUESTS_PENDING) {
@@ -64,13 +64,11 @@ struct kdbus_reply *kdbus_reply_new(struct kdbus_conn *reply_src,
r->waiting = true;
}

-exit_dec_request_count:
- if (ret < 0) {
- atomic_dec(&reply_dst->request_count);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
- }
-
return r;
+
+exit_dec_request_count:
+ atomic_dec(&reply_dst->request_count);
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}

static void __kdbus_reply_free(struct kref *kref)
--
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/