Re: UAPI headers including non-UAPI headers by accident?

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday 18 June 2015 09:52:36 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> [CC += David]
> 
> On 2 June 2015 at 18:36, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > include/uapi/linux/signal.h starts with:
> >
> > #ifndef _UAPI_LINUX_SIGNAL_H
> > #define _UAPI_LINUX_SIGNAL_H
> >
> > #include <asm/signal.h>
> > #include <asm/siginfo.h>
> >
> > This causes it to include <asm/signal.h>, which is not the same thing
> > as <uapi/asm/signal.h>.  Changing that will break userspace use of
> > this header, though, as the uapi/ won't get removed.
> >
> > What's the correct fix?  This is causing trouble with a UML build for me.
> 
> Perhaps David has some insight, since he architected the original UAPI split.

The uapi headers are installed without the uapi prefix. This means
that inside of the kernel, we get


 linux/signal.h
 -> uapi/linux/signal.h
    -> asm/signal.h
       -> uapi/asm/signal.h

while in the installed headers we just get

    linux/signal.h
       -> asm/signal.h

This all looks right to me: user space only sees the exported portions
under the traditional names, while the kernel sees both the kernel-side
and user-side definitions from the same path.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/