[PATCH v2 01/14] uml: Fix do_signal() prototype

[Andy Lutomirski]

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Once x86 exports its do_signal(), the prototypes will clash.

Fix the clash and also improve the code a bit: remove the unnecessary
kern_do_signal() indirection. This allows interrupt_end() to share
the 'regs' parameter calculation.

Also remove the unused return code to match x86.

Minimally build and boot tested.

Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Adjusted the commit message because I reordered the patch. --Andy]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h | 3 ++-
 arch/um/kernel/process.c           | 6 ++++--
 arch/um/kernel/signal.c            | 8 +-------
 arch/um/kernel/tlb.c               | 2 +-
 arch/um/kernel/trap.c              | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h b/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
index 83a91f976330..35ab97e4bb9b 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ extern int kmalloc_ok;
 extern unsigned long alloc_stack(int order, int atomic);
 extern void free_stack(unsigned long stack, int order);
 
-extern int do_signal(void);
+struct pt_regs;
+extern void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs);
 extern void interrupt_end(void);
 extern void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs);
 
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/process.c b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
index 68b9119841cd..a6d922672b9f 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
@@ -90,12 +90,14 @@ void *__switch_to(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *to)
 
 void interrupt_end(void)
 {
+	struct pt_regs *regs = &current->thread.regs;
+
 	if (need_resched())
 		schedule();
 	if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING))
-		do_signal();
+		do_signal(regs);
 	if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME))
-		tracehook_notify_resume(&current->thread.regs);
+		tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
 }
 
 void exit_thread(void)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
index 4f60e4aad790..57acbd67d85d 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	signal_setup_done(err, ksig, singlestep);
 }
 
-static int kern_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
+void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct ksignal ksig;
 	int handled_sig = 0;
@@ -110,10 +110,4 @@ static int kern_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 */
 	if (!handled_sig)
 		restore_saved_sigmask();
-	return handled_sig;
-}
-
-int do_signal(void)
-{
-	return kern_do_signal(&current->thread.regs);
 }
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c b/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
index f1b3eb14b855..2077248e8a72 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void fix_range_common(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start_addr,
 		/* We are under mmap_sem, release it such that current can terminate */
 		up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 		force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
-		do_signal();
+		do_signal(&current->thread.regs);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
index 8e4daf44e980..481311becb05 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void bad_segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip)
 void fatal_sigsegv(void)
 {
 	force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current);
-	do_signal();
+	do_signal(&current->thread.regs);
 	/*
 	 * This is to tell gcc that we're not returning - do_signal
 	 * can, in general, return, but in this case, it's not, since
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/