Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] acpi: Add acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Jun 18 2015 - 20:16:37 EST
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 05:10:38 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> The kernel initializes CPU & memory's NUMA topology from ACPI
> SRAT table. Some other ACPI tables, such as NFIT and DMAR,
> also contain proximity IDs for their device's NUMA topology.
> This information can be used to improve performance of these
> devices.
>
> This patch introduces acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node(), which maps
> a given pxm to an online node. This allows ACPI device driver
> modules to obtain a node from a device proximity ID. Unlike
> acpi_map_pxm_to_node(), this interface is guaranteed to return
> an online node so that the caller module can use the node without
> dealing with the node status. A node may be offline when a device
> proximity ID is unique, SRAT memory entry does not exist, or
> NUMA is disabled (ex. numa_off on x86).
>
> This patch also moves the pxm range check from acpi_get_node()
> to acpi_map_pxm_to_node().
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> index 1333cbdc..a64947e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/numa.h>
> +#include <linux/nodemask.h>
> +#include <linux/topology.h>
>
> #define PREFIX "ACPI: "
>
> @@ -70,7 +72,12 @@ static void __acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm, int node)
>
> int acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> {
> - int node = pxm_to_node_map[pxm];
> + int node;
> +
> + if (pxm < 0 || pxm >= MAX_PXM_DOMAINS)
> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> +
> + node = pxm_to_node_map[pxm];
>
> if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> if (nodes_weight(nodes_found_map) >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> @@ -83,6 +90,35 @@ int acpi_map_pxm_to_node(int pxm)
> return node;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return an online node from a pxm. This interface is intended for ACPI
> + * device drivers that obtain device NUMA topology from ACPI table, but
> + * do not initialize the node status.
> + */
Can you make this a proper kerneldoc, please? *Especially* that it is an
exported function.
The description is a bit terse too in my view.
> +int acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node(int pxm)
> +{
> + int node, n, dist, min_dist;
> +
> + node = acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> +
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + node = 0;
> +
> + if (!node_online(node)) {
> + min_dist = INT_MAX;
> + for_each_online_node(n) {
> + dist = node_distance(node, n);
> + if (dist < min_dist) {
> + min_dist = dist;
> + node = n;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return node;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node);
> +
> static void __init
> acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> @@ -328,8 +364,6 @@ int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
> int pxm;
>
> pxm = acpi_get_pxm(handle);
> - if (pxm < 0 || pxm >= MAX_PXM_DOMAINS)
> - return NUMA_NO_NODE;
>
> return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index e4da5e3..1b3bbb1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -289,8 +289,13 @@ extern void acpi_dmi_osi_linux(int enable, const struct dmi_system_id *d);
> extern void acpi_osi_setup(char *str);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +int acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node(int pxm);
> int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle);
> #else
> +static inline int acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node(int pxm)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> static inline int acpi_get_node(acpi_handle handle)
> {
> return 0;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/