Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq()

[Sergey Senozhatsky]

On (06/19/15 18:15), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[..]
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > > 	Maybe it's caused by the hpet driver itself?
> > > irq_set_affinity() may set the IRQD_SETAFFINITY_PENDING flag,
> > > thus triggering the warning.
> > And the usage pattern seems reasonable, the IRQF_NOBALANCING flag
> > means nobody may change the affinity except myself:)
> 
> Right, that's why I removed the restriction. 
>
> I just wonder why we have not seen that before ...

just a note,
I compile/run every linux-next on at least two different
x86-64 boxen, w/o changing the .config a lot.

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/