Re: [PATCH v7] dma: Add Xilinx AXI Direct Memory Access Engine driver support

From: Jeremy Trimble
Date: Fri Jun 19 2015 - 12:49:57 EST


> +/**
> + * xilinx_dma_start_transfer - Starts DMA transfer
> + * @chan: Driver specific channel struct pointer
> + */
> +static void xilinx_dma_start_transfer(struct xilinx_dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor *desc;
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment *head, *tail = NULL;
> +
> + if (chan->err)
> + return;
> +
> + if (list_empty(&chan->pending_list))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!chan->idle)
> + return;
> +
> + desc = list_first_entry(&chan->pending_list,
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_descriptor, node);
> +
> + if (chan->has_sg && xilinx_dma_is_running(chan) &&
> + !xilinx_dma_is_idle(chan)) {
> + tail = list_entry(desc->segments.prev,
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment, node);
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_TAILDESC, tail->phys);
> + goto out_free_desc;
> + }
> +
> + if (chan->has_sg) {
> + head = list_first_entry(&desc->segments,
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment, node);
> + tail = list_entry(desc->segments.prev,
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment, node);
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_CURDESC, head->phys);
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable interrupts */
> + dma_ctrl_set(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_CONTROL,
> + XILINX_DMA_XR_IRQ_ALL_MASK);
> +
> + xilinx_dma_start(chan);
> + if (chan->err)
> + return;
> +
> + /* Start the transfer */
> + if (chan->has_sg) {
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_TAILDESC, tail->phys);
> + } else {
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment *segment;
> + struct xilinx_dma_desc_hw *hw;
> +
> + segment = list_first_entry(&desc->segments,
> + struct xilinx_dma_tx_segment, node);
> + hw = &segment->hw;
> +
> + if (desc->direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_SRCADDR,
> + hw->buf_addr);
> + else
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_DSTADDR,
> + hw->buf_addr);
> +
> + /* Start the transfer */
> + dma_ctrl_write(chan, XILINX_DMA_REG_BTT,
> + hw->control & XILINX_DMA_MAX_TRANS_LEN);
> + }
> +
> +out_free_desc:
> + list_del(&desc->node);
> + chan->idle = false;
> + chan->active_desc = desc;
> +}

What prevents chan->active_desc from being overwritten before the
previous descriptor is transferred to done_list. For instance, if two
transfers are queued with issue_pending() in quick succession (such
that xilinx_dma_start_transfer() is called twice before the interrupt
for the first transfer occurs), won't the first descriptor be
overwritten and lost?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/