[PATCH 04/12] staging: lustre: ldlm: Use !x to check for kzalloc failure
From: Julia Lawall
Date: Sat Jun 20 2015 - 13:09:43 EST
!x is more normal for kzalloc failure in the kernel.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression x;
statement S1, S2;
@@
x = kzalloc(...);
if (
- x == NULL
+ !x
) S1 else S2
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c | 4 ++--
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_pool.c
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ static int ldlm_pools_thread_start(void)
return -EALREADY;
ldlm_pools_thread = kzalloc(sizeof(*ldlm_pools_thread), GFP_NOFS);
- if (ldlm_pools_thread == NULL)
+ if (!ldlm_pools_thread)
return -ENOMEM;
init_completion(&ldlm_pools_comp);
diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static void ldlm_handle_cp_callback(stru
void *lvb_data;
lvb_data = kzalloc(lvb_len, GFP_NOFS);
- if (lvb_data == NULL) {
+ if (!lvb_data) {
LDLM_ERROR(lock, "No memory: %d.\n", lvb_len);
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int ldlm_bl_to_thread(struct ldlm
struct ldlm_bl_work_item *blwi;
blwi = kzalloc(sizeof(*blwi), GFP_NOFS);
- if (blwi == NULL)
+ if (!blwi)
return -ENOMEM;
init_blwi(blwi, ns, ld, cancels, count, lock, cancel_flags);
@@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static int ldlm_setup(void)
return -EALREADY;
ldlm_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*ldlm_state), GFP_NOFS);
- if (ldlm_state == NULL)
+ if (!ldlm_state)
return -ENOMEM;
ldlm_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("ldlm", lustre_kobj);
@@ -1123,7 +1123,7 @@ static int ldlm_setup(void)
blp = kzalloc(sizeof(*blp), GFP_NOFS);
- if (blp == NULL) {
+ if (!blp) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@ struct ldlm_lock *ldlm_lock_create(struc
if (lvb_len) {
lock->l_lvb_len = lvb_len;
lock->l_lvb_data = kzalloc(lvb_len, GFP_NOFS);
- if (lock->l_lvb_data == NULL)
+ if (!lock->l_lvb_data)
goto out;
}
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ int ldlm_run_ast_work(struct ldlm_namesp
return 0;
arg = kzalloc(sizeof(*arg), GFP_NOFS);
- if (arg == NULL)
+ if (!arg)
return -ENOMEM;
atomic_set(&arg->restart, 0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/