Re: [PATCH 8/8] dt: cpufreq: st: Provide bindings for ST's CPUFreq implementation

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hello Lee and Viresh,

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 23-06-15, 08:06, Lee Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > > Over that, this patch should have been present before any other
>> > > patches using these bindings.
>> >
>> > I've never heard that one before, but it's easy to re-order the set.
>>
>> I don't know, but it seems obvious to me: Bindings first and then the
>> code.
>
> Do you always write your documentation before implementing a
> feature?
>
> Surely it goes;
>   Requirements Gathering
>   Plan and Prepare
>   Implement
>   Test
>   Document
>   Deliver
>
> ;)
>
> ... but as I say, I can re-order if required.  It's really not a problem.
>

This is actually documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt:
...

  3) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should come in the series before
     the code implementing the binding.

....

The rationale AFAIU is that it is easier to review the implementation
of a binding after reading the DT binding doc since then you can see
if the code matches what the DT binding describes.

Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/