[PATCH] c67: irq: don't reimplement __handle_domain_irq()

[Felipe Balbi]

c6x_do_IRQ() had a reimplementation of
__handle_domain_irq(), instead just call
that.

Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
---

Patch wasn't even compile tested because I really don't
have c6x GCC around. If someone could test the patch before
applying, that would avoid regressions.

 arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c | 13 ++-----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c b/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
index 247e0eb5e467..a7f73bc765ac 100644
--- a/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/c6x/kernel/irq.c
@@ -58,22 +58,13 @@ static struct irq_chip core_chip = {
 };
 
 static int prio_to_virq[NR_PRIORITY_IRQS];
+static struct irq_domain *core_domain;
 
 asmlinkage void c6x_do_IRQ(unsigned int prio, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
-
-	irq_enter();
-
-	generic_handle_irq(prio_to_virq[prio]);
-
-	irq_exit();
-
-	set_irq_regs(old_regs);
+	__handle_domain_irq(core_domain, prio, true, regs);
 }
 
-static struct irq_domain *core_domain;
-
 static int core_domain_map(struct irq_domain *h, unsigned int virq,
 			   irq_hw_number_t hw)
 {
-- 
2.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/