Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge?
From: Martin Steigerwald
Date: Wed Jun 24 2015 - 07:44:07 EST
Am Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2015, 10:05:02 schrieb Ingo Molnar:
> Not because I like it so much, but because I think the merge process
> should be stripped of politics and emotion as much as possible: if an
> initial submission is good and addresses all technical review properly,
> and if the cost to the core kernel is low, then barring alternative,
> fully equivalent and superior patch submissions, rejecting it does more
> harm than good.
Now that is an interesting challenge.
As I realize more and more we are all feeling beings.
Linus himself according to his own words as I received them wants to make
perfectly sure that the developer who receives a message from him exactly
knows how he feels, especially when he disagrees with a pull request and
does not want to take it.
To my perception the whole kernel development process is quite full of
emotion, including your message I reply to.
And now you want to get rid of it.
I bet you can.
If you remove Linusâ and every other kernel developer from the development
process, including yourself.
But then, who will develop the kernel?
I think a different way to handle emotions can help and I intend handle them
this way to see what results I create this way. I am aiming to feel my
feelings as they are, instead of immediately judging them or attaching a
thought to them basically making them emotions and distorting them that way,
blocking my energy in them [1].
So I will attempt to feel my feelings before I answer again. I didnÂt do so
in the last answer to you, and I think it shows.
[1] Arnold M. Patent, "You can have it all"
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/