Re: [PATCH 4.0 077/105] drm/i915: Dont skip request retirement if the active list is empty

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:29:13AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 4.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> The commit to be backported is already reverted in upstream, and I just
> got an email from you backporting the revert as well... would be best to
> *not* backport either of these:
> 
> commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
> Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
> 
>     drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
> 
> commit 245ec9d85696c3e539b23e210f248698b478379c
> Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Jun 15 12:59:37 2015 +0300
> 
>     Revert "drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty"
> 
> I only marked the revert cc: stable because the original was too.

This patch is now in 4.0 so what do I suggest I do?  Just take these as
well?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/