Re: kdbus: to merge or not to merge?

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> * David Lang <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > And the thing is, in hindsight, after such huge flamewars, years down the 
> > > line, almost never do I see the following question asked: 'what were we 
> > > thinking merging that crap??'. If any question arises it's usually along the 
> > > lines of: 'what was the big fuss about?'. So I think by and large the process 
> > > works.
> > 
> > counterexamples, devfs, tux
> 
> Actually, we never merged the Tux web server upstream, and the devfs concept has 
> kind of made a comeback via devtmpfs.

Bits of devfs also live on in sysfs. So devfs wasn't a bad initial idea IMHO, but 
we had to do one more (incompatible ...) iteration to figure out why we didn't 
like it.

Furthermore, I'm pretty sure there's a snowball's chance in hell that we'd have 
ended up with the current pretty cleaned up hardware/system ABI _without_ devfs. 
So it was a necessary pain.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/