Re: [PATCH-v4 1/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add device tree support

[Vaibhav Hiremath]

On Thursday 25 June 2015 03:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
> > Add DT support to the 88pm800 driver, along with compatible
> > field for it's sub-devices (rtc, onkey and regulator)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> > index 841717a..40fd014 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> >   #include <linux/mfd/88pm80x.h>
> >   #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >
> >   /* Interrupt Registers */
> >   #define PM800_INT_STATUS1		(0x05)
> > @@ -121,6 +122,11 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pm80x_id_table[] = {
> >   };
> >   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pm80x_id_table);
> >
> > +static const struct of_device_id pm80x_of_match_table[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "marvell,88pm800", },
> > +	{},
> > +};
> > +
> >   static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
> >   	{
> >   	 .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
> > @@ -133,6 +139,7 @@ static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
> >   static struct mfd_cell rtc_devs[] = {
> >   	{
> >   	 .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
> > +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-rtc",
> >   	 .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_resources),
> >   	 .resources = &rtc_resources[0],
> >   	 .id = -1,
> > @@ -151,6 +158,7 @@ static struct resource onkey_resources[] = {
> >   static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
> >   	{
> >   	 .name = "88pm80x-onkey",
> > +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-onkey",
> >   	 .num_resources = 1,
> >   	 .resources = &onkey_resources[0],
> >   	 .id = -1,
> > @@ -160,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
> >   static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
> >   	{
> >   	 .name = "88pm80x-regulator",
> > +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-regulator",
> >   	 .id = -1,
> >   	},
> >   };
> > @@ -544,8 +553,21 @@ static int pm800_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >   	int ret = 0;
> >   	struct pm80x_chip *chip;
> >   	struct pm80x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
> > +	struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
> >   	struct pm80x_subchip *subchip;
> >
> > +	if (!pdata && !np) {
> > +		dev_err(&client->dev,
> > +			"pm80x requires platform data or of_node\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!pdata) {
> > +		pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!pdata)
> > +			return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
>
> Why have you allocated data for pdata, then done nothing with it?

Not in this patch, but subsequent patches would use it.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/