Re: [PATCH v8 5/9] PCI: Add pci_iomap_wc() variants

[Borislav Petkov]

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 06:22:18PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> PCI BARs tell us whether prefetching is safe, but they don't say anything
> about write combining (WC).  WC changes ordering rules and allows writes to
> be collapsed, so it's not safe in general to use it on a prefetchable
> region.
> 
> Add pci_iomap_wc() and pci_iomap_wc_range() so drivers can take advantage
> of write combining when they know it's safe.
> 
> On architectures that don't fully support WC, e.g., x86 without PAT,
> drivers for legacy framebuffers may get some of the benefit by using
> arch_phys_wc_add() in addition to pci_iomap_wc().  But arch_phys_wc_add()
> is unreliable and should be avoided in general.  On x86, it uses MTRRs,
> which are limited in number and size, so the results will vary based on
> driver loading order.
> 
> The goals of adding pci_iomap_wc() are to:
> 
> - Give drivers an architecture-independent way to use WC so they can stop
>   using interfaces like mtrr_add() (on x86, pci_iomap_wc() uses
>   PAT when available)
> 
> - Move toward using _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC, not _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS,
>   on x86 on ioremap_nocache() (see de33c442ed2a ("x86 PAT: fix
>   performance drop for glx, use UC minus for ioremap(), ioremap_nocache()
>   and pci_mmap_page_range()")

...

> diff --git a/lib/pci_iomap.c b/lib/pci_iomap.c
> index bcce5f1..9604dcb 100644
> --- a/lib/pci_iomap.c
> +++ b/lib/pci_iomap.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,46 @@ void __iomem *pci_iomap_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_iomap_range);
>  
>  /**
> + * pci_iomap_wc_range - create a virtual WC mapping cookie for a PCI BAR
> + * @dev: PCI device that owns the BAR
> + * @bar: BAR number
> + * @offset: map memory at the given offset in BAR
> + * @maxlen: max length of the memory to map
> + *
> + * Using this function you will get a __iomem address to your device BAR.
> + * You can access it using ioread*() and iowrite*(). These functions hide
> + * the details if this is a MMIO or PIO address space and will just do what
> + * you expect from them in the correct way. When possible write combining
> + * is used.
> + *
> + * @maxlen specifies the maximum length to map. If you want to get access to
> + * the complete BAR from offset to the end, pass %0 here.
> + * */
> +void __iomem *pci_iomap_wc_range(struct pci_dev *dev,
> +				 int bar,
> +				 unsigned long offset,
> +				 unsigned long maxlen)
> +{
> +	resource_size_t start = pci_resource_start(dev, bar);
> +	resource_size_t len = pci_resource_len(dev, bar);
> +	unsigned long flags = pci_resource_flags(dev, bar);
> +
> +	if (len <= offset || !start)
> +		return NULL;
> +	len -= offset;
> +	start += offset;
> +	if (maxlen && len > maxlen)
> +		len = maxlen;
> +	if (flags & IORESOURCE_IO)
> +		return NULL;

I've moved this check at the beginning of the function so that we bail
out before doing the computations above it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/