Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] usb: xhci: remove stop device and ring doorbell in hub control and bus suspend

[Lu, Baolu]

On 06/25/2015 10:53 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 09.05.2015 04:15, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > There is no need to call xhci_stop_device() and xhci_ring_device() in
> > hub control and bus suspend functions since all device suspend and
> > resume have been notified through device_suspend/device_resume interfaces.
> I was looking through this code again before sending it forward, and it occurred to
> me that this might be breaking the PORT_SUSPEND and PORT_SET_LINK_STATE port features
> for xhci root hub.
>
> In normal use these requests are called by usb core in usb_port_suspend(), which
> also now notifies xhci, which makes sure xhci_stop_device() is called.
>
> But I don't think there is anything preventing an URB to be sent to the xhci roothub
> with a PORT_SUSPEND or PORT_SET_LINK_STATE port feature request. In this case the usb_port_suspend()
> is not called, and no notify will stop the device.
>
> For example hub validation tests might do this.

If that, we can drop this patch. It doesn't impact the other two patches 
in this patch series.

Thanks,
Baolu
> -Mathias
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/