Re: [PATCH-v4 3/3] mfd: devicetree: bindings: Add new 88pm800 mfd binding

[Vaibhav Hiremath]

On Friday 26 June 2015 11:35 AM, Yi Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0800, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> > With addition of DT support to 88pm800 mfd driver, this patch
> > adds new DT binding documentation along with respective properties.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f56b751
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/88pm800.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> > +* Marvell 88PM8xx Power Management IC
> > +
> > +Required parent device properties:
> > +- compatible : "marvell,88pm800", "marvell,88pm805", "marvell,88pm860"
> > +- reg : the I2C slave address for the 88pm8xx chip
> > +- interrupts : IRQ line for the 88pm8xx chip
> > +- interrupt-controller: describes the 88pm8xx as an interrupt controller
> > +- #interrupt-cells : should be 1.
> > +		- The cell is the 88pm8xx local IRQ number
> > +
> > +88pm8xx family of devices consists of varied group of sub-devices:
>    what about using "88pm80x family of devices..."?
>    for we also have another series of chip, with the name of 88pm88x..

I renamed it after Rob's suggestion, but at that time we didn't see
88pm88x coming.
But I think now, I should stick to 88pm800 only, as it doesn't make
match with both 88pm822 and 88pm860.

Rob, let me know if you think otherwise.

Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/