Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] redesign compaction algorithm

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 06/26/2015 04:14 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2015-06-26 3:56 GMT+09:00 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>:
> > > on non-movable would be maintained so fallback doesn't happen.
> >
> > There's nothing that guarantees that the migration scanner will be emptying
> > unmovable pageblock, or am I missing something?
>
> As replied to Mel's comment, as number of unmovable pageblocks, which is
> filled by movable pages due to this compaction change increases,
> possible candidate reclaimable/migratable pages from them also increase.
> So, at some time, amount of used page by free scanner and amount of
> migrated page by migration scanner would be balanced.
>
> > Worse, those pageblocks would be
> > marked to skip by the free scanner if it isolated free pages from them, so
> > migration scanner would skip them.
>
> Yes, but, next iteration will move out movable pages from that pageblock
> and freed pages will be used for further unmovable allocation.
> So, in the long term, this doesn't make much more fragmentation.

Theoretically, maybe. I guess there's not much point discussing it 
further, until there's data from experiments evaluating the long-term 
fragmentation (think of e.g. the number of mixed pageblocks you already 
checked in different experiments).

> Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/