Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform: x86: Deletion of checks before backlight_device_unregister()
From: Darren Hart
Date: Fri Jun 26 2015 - 19:07:35 EST
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:13:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > >
> > > What script was used ?
> >
> > A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
> > is in action on my software development system for a while.
> >
> >
> > > Is it in scripts/coccinelle ?
> >
> > Not yet.
> >
> > I hope that the involved update suggestions got sufficient positive feedback
> > to integrate five scripts there.
>
> The current scripts are very complicated, involving the interaction
> between multiple scripts and a database, and I think they are not very
> suitable for make coccicheck. Also, the idea of removing the null checks
> is not appropriate in all contexts. Perhaps it could be possible to add
> a script to the Linux kernel that handles a number of common cases for
> which removing the null test is widely considered to be desirable.
>
> julia
>
Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch? I didn't see
a reason to prevent it going in.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/