Re: [PATCH] bpf: Put perf_events check ahead of bpf prog

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On 6/26/15 11:44 PM, He Kuang wrote:
> @@ -1141,13 +1141,13 @@ kprobe_perf_func(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct pt_regs *regs)
>   	int size, __size, dsize;
>   	int rctx;
>
> -	if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> -		return;
> -
>   	head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
>   	if (hlist_empty(head))
>   		return;
>
> +	if (prog && !trace_call_bpf(prog, regs))
> +		return;

I considered doing that before placing it where it is now.
There were some issues with this approach. Trying to remember.
I'm traveling at the moment. Will elaborate next week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/