Re: [PATCH][v2] asus-rbtn: new driver for asus radio button for Windows 8

[Pali RohÃr]

On Friday 26 June 2015 23:24:10 Alex Hung wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Pali RohÃr <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Wednesday 24 June 2015 10:57:51 Alex Hung wrote:
> >> ASUS introduced a new approach to handle wireless hotkey
> >> since Windows 8.  When the hotkey is pressed, BIOS generates
> >> a notification 0x88 to a new ACPI device, ATK4001.  This
> >> new driver not only translates the notification to KEY_RFKILL
> >> but also toggles its LED accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> +static int asus_radio_led_set(bool blocked)
> >> +{
> >> +     acpi_status status;
> >> +     union acpi_object arg0 = { ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER };
> >> +     struct acpi_object_list args = { 1, &arg0 };
> >> +     unsigned long long output;
> >> +
> >> +     arg0.integer.value = blocked;
> >> +     status = acpi_evaluate_integer(asus_rbtn_device->handle, "HSWC",
> >> +                                    &args, &output);
> >
> > What is this ACPI call doing? Just set LED control? Or something more?
> >
> >> +     if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status) || output == 0) {
> >> +             pr_err("fail to change wireless LED.\n");
> >> +             return -EINVAL;
> >> +     }
> >> +
> >> +     return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int asus_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
> >> +{
> >> +     radio_led_state = blocked ? 0 : 1;
> >> +
> >> +     return asus_radio_led_set(radio_led_state);
> >> +}
> >
> > In my opinion this is not good idea that "rfkill block" call from
> > userspace just change LED on/off state and nothing more...
> >
> > If above ACPI call just change LED, then should not be this in LED
> > subsystem instead rfkill one? Or why do you prefer to use rfkill
> > interface instead led?
> 
> It indeed controls LED only at the moment.  My intention was to have
> have everything work without the need to modify any userspace
> applications.  Current it is 1) aus-rbtn issues KEY_RFKILL 2) an
> userspace application changes rfkill states, and 3) both radio and LED
> work.  It will also work when a user enable/disable wireless devices
> on a user application which uses rfkill interface.
> 
> Come to think about it now, I may have to handle LED with WLAN and BT
> but I will have to find a system with both devices later.
> 
> I am not too familiar with userspace applications v.s. LED.  Is it
> possible to do the same (i.e. without touching userspace)? I think
> rfkill is good interface to handle whatever needs doing when changing
> wireless states, such as LED controls.  However, if other approach can
> meet the need I am happy to investigate.
> 

There are triggers for led which automatically enable/disable led. I
think that configuring default wifi/bluetooth trigger for that new led
could work...

-- 
Pali RohÃr
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/