Re: [PATCH 3/3] printk: implement support for extended console drivers

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:47:49PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > netconsole itself is optional & modular.  I'm not sure making further
>> > splits is called for, especially given the use cases.
>>
>> It could be a hidden option, selected by its users (e.g. netconsole).
>
> Hmmm... what do you mean?

init/Kconfig:

        config PRINTK_EXT_LOG
                bool

drivers/net/Kconfig:

        config NETCONSOLE
                tristate "Network console logging support"
                select PRINTK_EXT_LOG

kernel/printk/printk.c:

        void console_unlock(void)
        {
#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_EXT_LOG
                static char ext_text[CONSOLE_EXT_LOG_MAX];
#endif

etc.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/