Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] tty: serial core: provide method to search uart by phandle
From: Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Date: Mon Jun 29 2015 - 12:44:48 EST
Hi,
thanks for the comments.
Am 28.06.2015 um 23:34 schrieb Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@xxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> Some comments below.
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:46:24PM +0200, Marek Belisko wrote:
>> From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> 1. add registered uart_ports to a search list
>> 2. provide a function to search an uart_port by phandle. This copies the
>> mechanism how devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() works
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/serial/slaves.txt | 36 ++++++++++++++
>> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/serial_core.h | 10 ++++
>> 3 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/serial/slaves.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/serial/slaves.txt b/Documentation/serial/slaves.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..6f8d44d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/serial/slaves.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> +UART slave device support
>> +
>> +A remote device connected to a RS232 interface is usually power controlled by the DTR line.
>> +The DTR line is managed automatically by the UART driver for open() and close() syscalls
>> +and on demand by tcsetattr().
>> +
>> +With embedded devices, the serial peripheral might be directly and always connected to the UART
>> +and there might be no physical DTR line involved. Power control (on/off) has to be done by some
>> +chip specific device driver (which we call "UART slave") through some mechanisms (I2C, GPIOs etc.)
>> +not related to the serial interface. Some devices do not explicitly tell their power state except
>> +by sending or not sending data to the UART. In such a case the device driver must be able to monitor
>> +data activity. The role of the device driver is to encapsulate such power control in a single place.
>> +
>> +This patch series allows to support such drivers by providing:
>> +* a mechanism that a slave driver can identify the UART instance it is connected to
>> +* a mechanism that UART slave drivers can register to be notified
>> +* notfications for DTR (and other modem control) state changes
>> +* notifications that the UART has received some data from the UART
>> +
>> +A slave device simply adds a phandle reference to the UART it is connected to, e.g.
>> +
>> + gps {
>> + compatible = "wi2wi,w2sg0004";
>> + uart = <&uart1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> +The slave driver calls devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle() to identify the uart driver.
>> +This API follows the concept of devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle().
>> +
>> +A slave device driver registers itself with serial_register_slave() to receive notifications.
>> +Notification handler callbacks can be registered by serial_register_mctrl_notification() and
>> +serial_register_rx_notification(). If an UART has registered a NULL slave or a NULL handler,
>> +no notifications are sent.
>> +
>> +RX notification handlers can define a ktermios during setup and the handler function can modify
>> +or decide to throw away each character that is passed upwards.
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> index eec067d..ad61441 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,33 @@
>> #include <asm/irq.h>
>> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>>
>> +static LIST_HEAD(uart_list);
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uart_lock);
>> +
>> +/* same concept as __of_usb_find_phy */
>> +static struct uart_port *__of_serial_find_uart(struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + struct uart_port *uart;
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(node))
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(uart, &uart_list, head) {
>> + if (node != uart->dev->of_node)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + return uart;
>
> We can easily save three lines here :)
Hm. We have copied from here:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c?id=refs/tags/v4.1#n65
So please let us know how you want to save 3 lines.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void devm_serial_uart_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
>> +{
>> + struct uart_port *uart = *(struct uart_port **)res;
>> + /* FIXME: serial_put_uart(uart); */
>> +}
>
> Looks unfinished…
Yes indeed. That is why we submit it as a RFC. Maybe someone can give us a comment
how memory management of uart nodes works.
>
>> +
>> /*
>> * This is used to lock changes in serial line configuration.
>> */
>> @@ -64,6 +91,78 @@ static int uart_dcd_enabled(struct uart_port *uport)
>> return !!(uport->status & UPSTAT_DCD_ENABLE);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle - find the uart by phandle
>> + * @dev - device that requests this uart
>> + * @phandle - name of the property holding the uart phandle value
>> + * @index - the index of the uart
>> + *
>> + * Returns the uart_port associated with the given phandle value,
>> + * after getting a refcount to it, -ENODEV if there is no such uart or
>> + * -EPROBE_DEFER if there is a phandle to the uart, but the device is
>> + * not yet loaded. While at that, it also associates the device with
>> + * the uart using devres. On driver detach, release function is invoked
>> + * on the devres data, then, devres data is freed.
>
> Add -ENOMEM and -EINVAL, remove -EPROBE_DEFER?
Well, if the device is not loaded it means the caller must return -EPROBE_DEFER
anyways since it can’t complete it’s probe function.
>
>> + *
>> + * For use by tty host and peripheral drivers.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/* same concept as devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() */
>> +
>> +struct uart_port *devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>> + const char *phandle, u8 index)
>> +{
>> + struct uart_port *uart = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM), **ptr;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->of_node) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> + }
>> +
>> + node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, phandle, index);
>> + if (!node) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get %s phandle in %s node\n", phandle,
>> + dev->of_node->full_name);
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> Indentation issue.
Thanks!
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_serial_uart_release, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ptr) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate memory for devres\n");
>> + goto err0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&uart_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + uart = __of_serial_find_uart(node);
>> + if (IS_ERR(uart)) {
>> + devres_free(ptr);
>
> I would rather create another goto label, say `out_devres_free' and
> checked uart for error there to stay similar across the function, but
> that's under question...
>
>> + goto err1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!try_module_get(uart->dev->driver->owner)) {
>> + uart = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + devres_free(ptr);
>> + goto err1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + *ptr = uart;
>> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
>
> What is the point of assigning value to *ptr?
Good question. I think it is necessary to store a copy of the found uart/phy instead of a reference.
Therefore the assignment to *ptr copies into the new memory area allocated above by
ptr = devres_alloc(devm_serial_uart_release, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
This makes the dev the owner of the data - instead of unknown ownership before.
It is the same as here (but it might be wrong/unnecessary there as well):
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c?id=refs/tags/v4.1#n209
Maybe it has something to do with the unfinished devm_serial_uart_release().
>
>> +
>> + get_device(uart->dev);
>> +
>> +err1:
>
> Naming of labels is against CodingStyle.
Same as:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c?id=refs/tags/v4.1#n214
but that can easily improved.
>
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uart_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +err0:
>> + of_node_put(node);
>> +
>> + return uart;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle);
>> +
>> /*
>> * This routine is used by the interrupt handler to schedule processing in
>> * the software interrupt portion of the driver.
>> @@ -2727,6 +2826,8 @@ int uart_add_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *uport)
>> */
>> uport->flags &= ~UPF_DEAD;
>>
>> + list_add_tail(&uport->head, &uart_list);
>> +
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&port->mutex);
>> mutex_unlock(&port_mutex);
>> @@ -2758,6 +2859,8 @@ int uart_remove_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *uport)
>>
>> mutex_lock(&port_mutex);
>>
>> + list_del(&uport->head);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Mark the port "dead" - this prevents any opens from
>> * succeeding while we shut down the port.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
>> index 297d4fa..ba23718 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
>> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ struct uart_port {
>> const struct attribute_group **tty_groups; /* all attributes (serial core use only) */
>> struct serial_rs485 rs485;
>> void *private_data; /* generic platform data pointer */
>> + struct list_head head; /* list of uarts e.g. to look up by phandle */
>> };
>>
>> static inline int serial_port_in(struct uart_port *up, int offset)
>> @@ -475,4 +476,13 @@ static inline int uart_handle_break(struct uart_port *port)
>> (cflag) & CRTSCTS || \
>> !((cflag) & CLOCAL))
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Helper functions for UART slave drivers
>> + */
>> +
>> +/* find UART by phandle (e.g. with 'uart = <&uart2>;' then call as
>> + * devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle(dev, "uart", 0);
>> + */
>> +extern struct uart_port *devm_serial_get_uart_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
>> + const char *phandle, u8 index);
>> #endif /* LINUX_SERIAL_CORE_H */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/