[PATCH v4 03/17] uml: Fix do_signal() prototype
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Jun 29 2015 - 15:36:07 EST
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Once x86 exports its do_signal(), the prototypes will clash.
Fix the clash and also improve the code a bit: remove the unnecessary
kern_do_signal() indirection. This allows interrupt_end() to share
the 'regs' parameter calculation.
Also remove the unused return code to match x86.
Minimally build and boot tested.
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Adjusted the commit message because I reordered the patch. --Andy]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h | 3 ++-
arch/um/kernel/process.c | 6 ++++--
arch/um/kernel/signal.c | 8 +-------
arch/um/kernel/tlb.c | 2 +-
arch/um/kernel/trap.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h b/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
index 83a91f976330..35ab97e4bb9b 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/shared/kern_util.h
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ extern int kmalloc_ok;
extern unsigned long alloc_stack(int order, int atomic);
extern void free_stack(unsigned long stack, int order);
-extern int do_signal(void);
+struct pt_regs;
+extern void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void interrupt_end(void);
extern void relay_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs);
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/process.c b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
index 68b9119841cd..a6d922672b9f 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/process.c
@@ -90,12 +90,14 @@ void *__switch_to(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *to)
void interrupt_end(void)
{
+ struct pt_regs *regs = ¤t->thread.regs;
+
if (need_resched())
schedule();
if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SIGPENDING))
- do_signal();
+ do_signal(regs);
if (test_and_clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME))
- tracehook_notify_resume(¤t->thread.regs);
+ tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
}
void exit_thread(void)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
index 4f60e4aad790..57acbd67d85d 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/signal.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
signal_setup_done(err, ksig, singlestep);
}
-static int kern_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
+void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct ksignal ksig;
int handled_sig = 0;
@@ -110,10 +110,4 @@ static int kern_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
*/
if (!handled_sig)
restore_saved_sigmask();
- return handled_sig;
-}
-
-int do_signal(void)
-{
- return kern_do_signal(¤t->thread.regs);
}
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c b/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
index f1b3eb14b855..2077248e8a72 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/tlb.c
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ void fix_range_common(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start_addr,
/* We are under mmap_sem, release it such that current can terminate */
up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
force_sig(SIGKILL, current);
- do_signal();
+ do_signal(¤t->thread.regs);
}
}
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
index 47ff9b7f3e5d..1b0f5c59d522 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/trap.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static void bad_segv(struct faultinfo fi, unsigned long ip)
void fatal_sigsegv(void)
{
force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV, current);
- do_signal();
+ do_signal(¤t->thread.regs);
/*
* This is to tell gcc that we're not returning - do_signal
* can, in general, return, but in this case, it's not, since
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/