[PATCH 2/3] x86, perf: Support custom test values for extra_regs

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Mon Jun 29 2015 - 17:23:08 EST


From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Current kernels always test extra registers at boot with RMW
cycle, to catch lying virtual machines.

For a new register the standard 0x1ff test value does not work,
as 0x1ff is not a valid value and causes an #GP.

Add the ability to add custom test values to an extra_reg
into the description tables.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 15 +++++++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 3598f67..2a4701c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -422,23 +422,30 @@ struct extra_reg {
u64 valid_mask;
int idx; /* per_xxx->regs[] reg index */
bool extra_msr_access;
+ u64 test_value;
};

-#define EVENT_EXTRA_REG(e, ms, m, vm, i) { \
+#define EVENT_EXTRA_REG(e, ms, m, vm, i, t) { \
.event = (e), \
.msr = (ms), \
.config_mask = (m), \
.valid_mask = (vm), \
.idx = EXTRA_REG_##i, \
.extra_msr_access = true, \
+ .test_value = t, \
}

#define INTEL_EVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, vm, idx) \
- EVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT, vm, idx)
+ EVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT, vm, idx, \
+ 0x1ffUL)

#define INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, vm, idx) \
EVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT | \
- ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK, vm, idx)
+ ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK, vm, idx, 0x1ffUL)
+
+#define INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG_TVAL(event, msr, vm, idx, tval) \
+ EVENT_EXTRA_REG(event, msr, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT | \
+ ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_UMASK, vm, idx, tval)

#define INTEL_UEVENT_PEBS_LDLAT_EXTRA_REG(c) \
INTEL_UEVENT_EXTRA_REG(c, \
@@ -446,7 +453,7 @@ struct extra_reg {
0xffff, \
LDLAT)

-#define EVENT_EXTRA_END EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0, 0, 0, 0, RSP_0)
+#define EVENT_EXTRA_END EVENT_EXTRA_REG(0, 0, 0, 0, RSP_0, 0)

union perf_capabilities {
struct {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 7c397e8..4df6783 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -3575,7 +3575,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
*/
if (x86_pmu.extra_regs) {
for (er = x86_pmu.extra_regs; er->msr; er++) {
- er->extra_msr_access = check_msr(er->msr, 0x1ffUL);
+ er->extra_msr_access = check_msr(er->msr,
+ er->test_value);
/* Disable LBR select mapping */
if ((er->idx == EXTRA_REG_LBR) && !er->extra_msr_access)
x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map = NULL;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
index 2749965..5bfa493 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
@@ -136,11 +136,12 @@
NHMEX_M_PMON_CTL_FLAG_MODE)
#define MBOX_INC_SEL_EXTAR_REG(c, r) \
EVENT_EXTRA_REG(MBOX_INC_SEL(c), NHMEX_M0_MSR_PMU_##r, \
- MBOX_INC_SEL_MASK, (u64)-1, NHMEX_M_##r)
+ MBOX_INC_SEL_MASK, (u64)-1, NHMEX_M_##r, \
+ 0x1ffUL)
#define MBOX_SET_FLAG_SEL_EXTRA_REG(c, r) \
EVENT_EXTRA_REG(MBOX_SET_FLAG_SEL(c), NHMEX_M0_MSR_PMU_##r, \
MBOX_SET_FLAG_SEL_MASK, \
- (u64)-1, NHMEX_M_##r)
+ (u64)-1, NHMEX_M_##r, 0x1ffUL)

/* NHM-EX Rbox */
#define NHMEX_R_MSR_GLOBAL_CTL 0xe00
--
2.4.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/