Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] arch, x86: pmem api for ensuring durability of persistent memory updates

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Tue Jun 30 2015 - 06:22:34 EST


On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 05:37:49AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index 867722591be2..9a528d945498 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> # define __rcu __attribute__((noderef, address_space(4)))

On this side of the #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER statement then
__pmem isn't defined so it leads to a build error running a CHECKER on
today's linux-next.

I would define __pmem away, but I don't understand why __pmem and
CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER are related at all. Maybe it should be
outside the if statement?

> #else
> # define __rcu
> +# define __pmem __attribute__((noderef, address_space(5)))
> #endif
> extern void __chk_user_ptr(const volatile void __user *);
> extern void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *);
> @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ extern void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *);
> # define __cond_lock(x,c) (c)
> # define __percpu
> # define __rcu
> +# define __pmem
> #endif
>
> /* Indirect macros required for expanded argument pasting, eg. __LINE__. */

regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/