Re: [PATCH V2] lib/bitmap.c: fix some parsing issues and code style
From: Frans Klaver
Date: Wed Jul 01 2015 - 02:36:04 EST
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hello, Frans
> thanks for your reply :)
>
> On 2015å07æ01æ 14:17, Frans Klaver wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Pan Xinhui <xinhuix.pan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> In __bitmap_parselist we can accept whitespaces on head or tail
>>> during every parsing procedure.
>>> If input has valid ranges, there is no reason to reject the user.
>>>
>>> fixes are:
>>> 1) if input ends with ',', bit 0 might be set unexpectedly.
>>> now we check if any digit is available after every loop.
>>> 2) if input has '0-', bit 0 might be set unexpectedly,
>>> now we return -EINVAL as this kind of input is definitely wrong.
>>> 3) minor code style fix in __bitmap_parse.
>>> and avoid in-loop incrementation of ndigits.
>>
>>
>> Why not three patches, so it becomes easier to see which is which?
>>
> your advice sounds good, I will have a try. and welcome for review. :)
> thanks.
>
>>
>>> commit 2528a8b also add some check, but it's still not enough.
>>> it only correct the result in fix 1 above.
>>
>>
>> I believe the convention is to have at least 12 characters of the
>> sha1, with the title behind it: 2528a8b8f457 (__bitmap_parselist: fix
>> bug in empty string handling). Using only seven characters still risks
>> collisions.
>>
> sorry for my lack knowledge of comment rules. thanks for pointing out my
> mistakes.
No problem. These kinds of things can be caught if you use
scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patches before sending, by the way.
You should probably read Documentation/SubmittingPatches if you
haven't already done so.
Frans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/