Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arch: unify ioremap prototypes and macro aliases

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> One useful feature of the ifdef mess as implemented in the patch is
>> that you could test for whether ioremap_cache() is actually
>> implemented or falls back to default ioremap().  I think for
>> completeness archs should publish an ioremap type capabilities mask
>> for drivers that care... (I can imagine pmem caring), or default to
>> being permissive if something like IOREMAP_STRICT is not set.  There's
>> also the wrinkle of archs that can only support certain types of
>> mappings at a given alignment.
>
> I think doing this at runtime might be a better idea.  E.g. a
> ioremap_flags with the CACHED argument will return -EOPNOTSUP unless
> actually implemented.  On various architectures different CPUs or
> boards will have different capabilities in this area.

So it would be the responsibility of the caller to fall back from
ioremap(..., CACHED) to ioremap(..., UNCACHED)?
I.e. all drivers using it should be changed...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/