Re: [PATCH v2] dell-laptop: Check return value of all SMBIOS calls and do not cache hwswitch state
From: Pali RohÃr
Date: Wed Jul 01 2015 - 14:05:00 EST
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 01:02:40 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Pali RohÃr wrote:
> > Make sure that return value of all SMBIOS calls are properly
> > checked and do not continue of processing (received) information
> > if call failed.
> >
> > Also do not chache hwswitch wireless state as it can be changed at
> > runtime (e.g from userspace smbios applications).
>
> This "Also do.." tripled the size of the patch. This should really be
> two patches.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Pali RohÃr <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > * Call clear_buffer before each sequential SMBIOS call (we expect
> > zero-filled buffer)
>
> Another good independent patch candidate
>
Ok, I will split it into 3 patches.
> > * Do not cache hwswitch state as it can be modified at runtime by
> > userspace * simplify some conditions
> >
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 173
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 127
> > insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
> > b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c index 35758cb..99f28d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
>
> ...
>
> > static void dell_update_rfkill(struct work_struct *ignored)
> > {
> >
> > + int hwswitch;
> >
> > int status;
> >
> > + int ret;
> >
> > get_buffer();
> >
> > +
> >
> > dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
> >
> > + ret = buffer->output[0];
> >
> > status = buffer->output[1];
> >
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + clear_buffer();
> > +
> > + buffer->input[0] = 0x2;
> > + dell_send_request(buffer, 17, 11);
> > + ret = buffer->output[0];
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0 && (status & BIT(0)))
> > + hwswitch = buffer->output[1];
> > + else
> > + hwswitch = 0;
>
> Initializing hwswitch to 0 above saves the else and assignment line
> here. Generally preferred.
>
Ok.
> ...
>
> > static int dell_get_intensity(struct backlight_device *bd)
> > {
> >
> > - int ret = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > + int token;
>
> Since we're talking respin, declare in order of descending line
> length please, just as you did later when adding token to a
> function.
Ok.
--
Pali RohÃr
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.