Re: [PATCH 44/51] writeback: implement bdi_wait_for_completion()

[Tejun Heo]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 06:09:18PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -161,17 +178,34 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> >  	trace_writeback_queue(wb->bdi, work);
> >  
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
> > -	if (!test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
> > -		if (work->done)
> > -			complete(work->done);
> > +	if (!test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
> >  		goto out_unlock;
> 
> This seems like a change in behavior. Previously unregistered wbs just
> completed the work->done, now you don't complete them. Is that intentional?

If nothing is queued, the cnt is never increased and the wait becomes
noop.  The default states are different between completion and
wb_completion.  There's no need to do anything to indicate that
nothing needs to be waited.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/