Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: cpuidle: add __init section marker to arm_cpuidle_init
From: Jisheng Zhang
Date: Thu Jul 02 2015 - 01:01:41 EST
Dear Krzysztof,
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015 12:59:44 +0900
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2015-07-02 11:14 GMT+09:00 Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > It is not needed after booting, this patch moves the arm_cpuidle_init()
> > function to the __init section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> > index 0f74f05..5748d3b 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
> > -extern int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu);
> > +extern int __init arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu);
>
> No, not here but...
>
> > extern int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index);
> > #else
> > static inline int arm_cpuidle_init(unsigned int cpu)
>
> ... here so the stub for !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE would be marked as well.
when !CONFIG_CPU_IDLE, arm_cpuidle_init() is inlined, and just return -EOPNOTSUPP;
Per my understanding, it will be optimized out by compiler. I'm not sure whether
there is any benefit to mark inlined function as __init. But Per my check, all
other inlined functions in linux kernel have no __init. What do you think?
Thanks,
Jisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/