Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Fri Jul 03 2015 - 02:52:29 EST
On 03/07/2015 04:43, Wu, Feng wrote:
>
> struct irq_bypass_consumer {
> struct list_head node;
> void *token;
> + unsigned irq; /*got from producer when registered*/
> void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*update)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> };
>
> 'update' is used to update the IRTE, while irq is initialized when
> registered, which is used to find the right IRTE.
Feel free to add "update" in your PI patches. I am not sure if "irq"
belongs here or in the containing struct. You can play with both and
submit the version that looks better to you.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/