Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding control

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 03/07/2015 08:54, Eric Auger wrote:
>> > Oh... we can get gsi from irq_bypass_consumer -> _irqfd -> gsi, so it
>> > is not needed in irq_bypass_consumer. Got it! :)
> The issue I have is that struct _irqfd is local to eventfd.c so it
> cannot be used in archi specific code. Is it acceptable to move it to
> kvm_host.h, naming it something like kvm_kernel_irqfd (as done for
> kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry)? Would also need to move _irqfd_resampler
> there (kvm_kernel_irqfd_resampler).

Yes, that's okay.  Can you put it in a new header file kvm_irqfd.h though?

Paolo

> irqfd user struct cannot be used in a standalone manner since we miss
> the kvm handle.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/