Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale

From: Mark yao
Date: Fri Jul 03 2015 - 05:18:21 EST

Next message: Paul Bolle: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] kconfig: allow use of relations other than (in)equality"
Previous message: cee1: "Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1"
In reply to: Tomasz Figa: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale"
Next in thread: Tomasz Figa: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2015å07æ03æ 15:46, Tomasz Figa wrote:

Hi Mark,

Please see my comments inline.

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Mark Yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Win_full support 1/8 to 8 scale down/up engine, support
all format scale.

[snip]

@@ -351,6 +412,15 @@ static inline void vop_mask_write_relaxed(struct vop *vop, uint32_t offset,
}
}

+static inline int _get_vskiplines(uint32_t srch, uint32_t dsth)
+{
+ if (srch >= (uint32_t)(4 * dsth * MIN_SCL_FT_AFTER_VSKIP))
+ return 4;
+ else if (srch >= (uint32_t)(2 * dsth * MIN_SCL_FT_AFTER_VSKIP))
+ return 2;
+ return 1;

How about rewriting the above to:

#define SCL_MAX_VSKIPLINES 4

uint32_t vskiplines;

for (vskiplines = SCL_MAX_VSKIPLINES; vskiplines > 1; vskiplines /= 2)
if (srch >= vskiplines * dsth * MIN_SCL_FT_AFTER_VSKIP)
break;

return vskiplines;

nit: I believe it would be better for readability to move this
function to other scaler related functions below.
nit: I don't see any existing functions with names starting from _, so
to keep existing conventions, how about calling them scl_*, e.g.
scl_get_vskiplines().

+}
+
static enum vop_data_format vop_convert_format(uint32_t format)
{
switch (format) {
@@ -538,6 +608,310 @@ static void vop_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
pm_runtime_put(vop->dev);
}

+static int _vop_cal_yrgb_lb_mode(int width)
+{
+ int lb_mode = LB_RGB_1920X5;
+
+ if (width > 2560)
+ lb_mode = LB_RGB_3840X2;
+ else if (width > 1920)
+ lb_mode = LB_RGB_2560X4;

It would be more readable to add

else
lb_mode = LB_RGB_1920X5;

instead of initializing the variable at declaration time.

+
+ return lb_mode;
+}
+
+static int _vop_cal_cbcr_lb_mode(int width)
+{
+ int lb_mode = LB_YUV_2560X8;
+
+ if (width > 2560)
+ lb_mode = LB_RGB_3840X2;
+ else if (width > 1920)
+ lb_mode = LB_RGB_2560X4;
+ else if (width > 1280)
+ lb_mode = LB_YUV_3840X5;
+
+ return lb_mode;
+}
+
+static void _vop_cal_scl_fac(struct vop *vop, const struct vop_win_data *win,
+ uint32_t src_w, uint32_t src_h, uint32_t dst_w,
+ uint32_t dst_h, uint32_t pixel_format)
+{
+ uint16_t yrgb_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;
+ uint16_t yrgb_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;
+ uint16_t cbr_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;
+ uint16_t cbr_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;
+ uint16_t yrgb_hsd_mode = SCALE_DOWN_BIL;
+ uint16_t cbr_hsd_mode = SCALE_DOWN_BIL;
+ uint16_t yrgb_vsd_mode = SCALE_DOWN_BIL;
+ uint16_t cbr_vsd_mode = SCALE_DOWN_BIL;

No code seems to be assigning the 4 variables above. Is some code
missing or they are simply constants and they (and code checking their
values) are not necessary?

those value directly write to the vop regs, it's necessary.

+ uint16_t yrgb_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIL;
+ uint16_t cbr_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIL;
+ uint16_t scale_yrgb_x = 1 << SCL_FT_DEFAULT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT;
+ uint16_t scale_yrgb_y = 1 << SCL_FT_DEFAULT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT;
+ uint16_t scale_cbcr_x = 1 << SCL_FT_DEFAULT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT;
+ uint16_t scale_cbcr_y = 1 << SCL_FT_DEFAULT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT;
+ int hsub = drm_format_horz_chroma_subsampling(pixel_format);
+ int vsub = drm_format_vert_chroma_subsampling(pixel_format);
+ bool is_yuv = is_yuv_support(pixel_format);
+ uint16_t vsd_yrgb_gt4 = 0;
+ uint16_t vsd_yrgb_gt2 = 0;
+ uint16_t vsd_cbr_gt4 = 0;
+ uint16_t vsd_cbr_gt2 = 0;
+ uint16_t yrgb_src_w = src_w;
+ uint16_t yrgb_src_h = src_h;
+ uint16_t yrgb_dst_w = dst_w;
+ uint16_t yrgb_dst_h = dst_h;
+ uint16_t cbcr_src_w;
+ uint16_t cbcr_src_h;
+ uint16_t cbcr_dst_w;
+ uint16_t cbcr_dst_h;
+ uint32_t vdmult;
+ uint16_t lb_mode;

The amount of local variables suggests that this function needs to be
split into several smaller ones.

By the way, do you need to initialize all of them? GCC will at least
warn (if not error out) if an unitialized variable is referenced, so
it's enough to make sure that the code correctly covers all branch
paths, which is actually better for the code than to rely on default
value.

Yeah, some value directly write to the vop, some value gcc report the warn, so initialize them.

+
+ if (((yrgb_dst_w << 3) <= yrgb_src_w) ||
+ ((yrgb_dst_h << 3) <= yrgb_src_h) ||

Hmm, if this is enforcing the maximum downscaling factor, then
wouldn't it be more readable to write like this:

yrgb_src_w >= 8 * yrgb_dst_w

Also is >= correct here? Is the maximum factor less than 8?

yrgb_src_w >= 8 * yrgb_dst_w means we can't scale down exceed 8,
means that (src_w)1920->(dst_w)240 is wrong.

+ yrgb_dst_w > 3840) {

I'd suggest moving this to separate if with different error message.

+ DRM_ERROR("yrgb scale exceed 8,src[%dx%d] dst[%dx%d]\n",
+ yrgb_src_w, yrgb_src_h, yrgb_dst_w, yrgb_dst_h);

Hmm, maybe "Maximum downscaling factor (8) exceeded" and then for the
destination width check "Maximum destination width (3840) exceeded"?

OK.

+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (yrgb_src_w < yrgb_dst_w)
+ yrgb_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_UP;
+ else if (yrgb_src_w > yrgb_dst_w)
+ yrgb_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_DOWN;
+ else
+ yrgb_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;

This looks like a good candidate for a helper function:

enum scl_mode scl_get_scl_mode(uint32_t src, uint32_t dst)
{
if (src < dst)
return SCALE_UP;
else if (src > dst)
return SCALE_DOWN;
else
return SCALE_NONE;
}

+
+ if (yrgb_src_h < yrgb_dst_h)
+ yrgb_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_UP;
+ else if (yrgb_src_h > yrgb_dst_h)
+ yrgb_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_DOWN;
+ else
+ yrgb_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_NONE;

And now the helper function could be used here as well.

+
+ if (is_yuv) {
+ cbcr_src_w = src_w / hsub;
+ cbcr_src_h = src_h / vsub;
+ cbcr_dst_w = dst_w;
+ cbcr_dst_h = dst_h;
+ if ((cbcr_dst_w << 3) <= cbcr_src_w ||
+ (cbcr_dst_h << 3) <= cbcr_src_h ||
+ cbcr_src_w > 3840 ||
+ cbcr_src_w == 0)
+ DRM_ERROR("cbcr scale failed,src[%dx%d] dst[%dx%d]\n",
+ cbcr_src_w, cbcr_src_h,
+ cbcr_dst_w, cbcr_dst_h);

I believe you should have those already enforced by Y plane. Also it
doesn't seem reasonable to ever get 0 src width as an argument for
this function.

+ if (cbcr_src_w < cbcr_dst_w)
+ cbr_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_UP;
+ else if (cbcr_src_w > cbcr_dst_w)
+ cbr_hor_scl_mode = SCALE_DOWN;
+
+ if (cbcr_src_h < cbcr_dst_h)
+ cbr_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_UP;
+ else if (cbcr_src_h > cbcr_dst_h)
+ cbr_ver_scl_mode = SCALE_DOWN;

Aren't the scl_modes for CbCr planes always the same as for Y plane?

No, such as src(1920 x 1080) -> dst(1280x800), yuv format is NV12.
so Y plane horizontal and vertical is scale down.

but src_w = 1920 / 2 = 960 < 1280
src_h = 1080 / 2 = 540 < 800.

So Cbcr horizontal and vertical is scale up.

+ }
+ /*
+ * line buffer mode
+ */
+ if (is_yuv) {
+ if (yrgb_hor_scl_mode == SCALE_DOWN && yrgb_dst_w > 2560)
+ lb_mode = LB_RGB_3840X2;
+ else if (cbr_hor_scl_mode == SCALE_DOWN)
+ lb_mode = _vop_cal_cbcr_lb_mode(cbcr_dst_w);
+ else
+ lb_mode = _vop_cal_cbcr_lb_mode(cbcr_src_w);
+ } else {
+ if (yrgb_hor_scl_mode == SCALE_DOWN)
+ lb_mode = _vop_cal_yrgb_lb_mode(yrgb_dst_w);
+ else
+ lb_mode = _vop_cal_yrgb_lb_mode(yrgb_src_w);
+ }

I guess this could be moved into a helper function.

+
+ switch (lb_mode) {
+ case LB_YUV_3840X5:
+ case LB_YUV_2560X8:
+ case LB_RGB_1920X5:
+ case LB_RGB_1280X8:
+ yrgb_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIC;
+ cbr_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIC;

I might be overlooking something, but don't yrgb_vsu_mode and
cbr_vsu_mode always have the same values?

Hmm, yrgb_vsu_mode and cbr_vsu_mode mean different vop config, OK, I think it can merge
together.

+ break;
+ case LB_RGB_3840X2:
+ if (yrgb_ver_scl_mode != SCALE_NONE)
+ DRM_ERROR("ERROR : not allow yrgb ver scale\n");
+ if (cbr_ver_scl_mode != SCALE_NONE)
+ DRM_ERROR("ERROR : not allow cbcr ver scale\n");

Shouldn't these return error? Also it would be nice to make the error
messages more helpful.

OK.

+ break;
+ case LB_RGB_2560X4:
+ yrgb_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIL;
+ cbr_vsu_mode = SCALE_UP_BIL;
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport lb_mode:%d\n", lb_mode);
+ break;
+ }

Anyway, this whole switch is a candidate for a helper function.

This only use one time, it's ok to be a helper function?

+ /*
+ * (1.1)YRGB HOR SCALE FACTOR
+ */
+ switch (yrgb_hor_scl_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP:
+ scale_yrgb_x = GET_SCL_FT_BIC(yrgb_src_w, yrgb_dst_w);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN:
+ switch (yrgb_hsd_mode) {
+ case SCALE_DOWN_BIL:
+ scale_yrgb_x = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN(yrgb_src_w,
+ yrgb_dst_w);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN_AVG:
+ scale_yrgb_x = GET_SCL_FT_AVRG(yrgb_src_w, yrgb_dst_w);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport yrgb_hsd_mode:%d\n",
+ yrgb_hsd_mode);

Shouldn't this return an error?

+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ }

Ditto.

+
+ /*
+ * (1.2)YRGB VER SCALE FACTOR
+ */
+ switch (yrgb_ver_scl_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP:
+ switch (yrgb_vsu_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP_BIL:
+ scale_yrgb_y = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_UP(yrgb_src_h,
+ yrgb_dst_h);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_UP_BIC:
+ if (yrgb_src_h < 3)
+ DRM_ERROR("yrgb_src_h should greater than 3\n");

Shouldn't this return an error?

+ scale_yrgb_y = GET_SCL_FT_BIC(yrgb_src_h, yrgb_dst_h);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport yrgb_vsu_mode:%d\n",
+ yrgb_vsu_mode);

Shouldn't this return an error?

+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN:
+ switch (yrgb_vsd_mode) {
+ case SCALE_DOWN_BIL:
+ vdmult = _get_vskiplines(yrgb_src_h, yrgb_dst_h);
+ scale_yrgb_y = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN_VSKIP(yrgb_src_h,
+ yrgb_dst_h,
+ vdmult);
+ if (vdmult == 4) {
+ vsd_yrgb_gt4 = 1;
+ vsd_yrgb_gt2 = 0;
+ } else if (vdmult == 2) {
+ vsd_yrgb_gt4 = 0;
+ vsd_yrgb_gt2 = 1;
+ }

How about something like this:

vsd_yrgb_gt4 = (vdmult == 4);
vsd_yrgb_gt2 = (vdmult == 2);

But I think it's not easy to read.

+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN_AVG:
+ scale_yrgb_y = GET_SCL_FT_AVRG(yrgb_src_h, yrgb_dst_h);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport yrgb_vsd_mode:%d\n",
+ yrgb_vsd_mode);

Shouldn't this return an error?

+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ }

Another candidate for separate helper function.

+ /*
+ * (2.1)CBCR HOR SCALE FACTOR
+ */
+ switch (cbr_hor_scl_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP:
+ scale_cbcr_x = GET_SCL_FT_BIC(cbcr_src_w, cbcr_dst_w);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN:
+ switch (cbr_hsd_mode) {
+ case SCALE_DOWN_BIL:
+ scale_cbcr_x = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN(cbcr_src_w,
+ cbcr_dst_w);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN_AVG:
+ scale_cbcr_x = GET_SCL_FT_AVRG(cbcr_src_w, cbcr_dst_w);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport cbr_hsd_mode:%d\n", cbr_hsd_mode);

Error.

+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ }

Isn't this switch exactly the same as for Y plane just with different
widths used? Also, wouldn't the values for CbCr plane be the same as
for Y plane?

But Cbcr case is not same as Y plane case, how to merge?

+
+ /*
+ * (2.2)CBCR VER SCALE FACTOR
+ */
+ switch (cbr_ver_scl_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP:
+ switch (cbr_vsu_mode) {
+ case SCALE_UP_BIL:
+ scale_cbcr_y = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_UP(cbcr_src_h,
+ cbcr_dst_h);
+ break;
+ case SCALE_UP_BIC:
+ if (cbcr_src_h < 3)
+ DRM_ERROR("cbcr_src_h need greater than 3 !\n");
+ scale_cbcr_y = GET_SCL_FT_BIC(cbcr_src_h, cbcr_dst_h);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport cbr_vsu_mode:%d\n", cbr_vsu_mode);

Error.

+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN:
+ switch (cbr_vsd_mode) {
+ case SCALE_DOWN_BIL:
+ vdmult = _get_vskiplines(cbcr_src_h, cbcr_dst_h);
+ scale_cbcr_y = GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN_VSKIP(cbcr_src_h,
+ cbcr_dst_h,
+ vdmult);
+ if (vdmult == 4) {
+ vsd_cbr_gt4 = 1;
+ vsd_cbr_gt2 = 0;
+ } else if (vdmult == 2) {
+ vsd_cbr_gt4 = 0;
+ vsd_cbr_gt2 = 1;
+ }
+ break;
+ case SCALE_DOWN_AVG:
+ scale_cbcr_y = GET_SCL_FT_AVRG(cbcr_src_h, cbcr_dst_h);
+ break;
+ default:
+ DRM_ERROR("unsupport cbr_vsd_mode:%d\n", cbr_vsd_mode);
+ break;
+ }
+ break;
+ }

Again, this looks like the values for CbCr would be the same as for Y.
Are there actually cases when they differ?

Hmm, Actually the cbcr calculations have some different with Y.

+
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, yrgb_hor_scl_mode, yrgb_hor_scl_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, yrgb_ver_scl_mode, yrgb_ver_scl_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, cbr_hor_scl_mode, cbr_hor_scl_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, cbr_ver_scl_mode, cbr_ver_scl_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, lb_mode, lb_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, yrgb_hsd_mode, yrgb_hsd_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, cbr_hsd_mode, cbr_hsd_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, yrgb_vsd_mode, yrgb_vsd_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, cbr_vsd_mode, cbr_vsd_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, yrgb_vsu_mode, yrgb_vsu_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, cbr_vsu_mode, cbr_vsu_mode);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, scale_yrgb_x, scale_yrgb_x);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, scale_yrgb_y, scale_yrgb_y);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, vsd_yrgb_gt4, vsd_yrgb_gt4);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, vsd_yrgb_gt2, vsd_yrgb_gt2);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, scale_cbcr_x, scale_cbcr_x);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, scale_cbcr_y, scale_cbcr_y);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, vsd_cbr_gt4, vsd_cbr_gt4);
+ VOP_SCL_SET(vop, win, vsd_cbr_gt2, vsd_cbr_gt2);

If you split this function into smaller ones, you probably don't want
to keep all the writes like here in one place, but rather make the
smaller functions write particular registers after calculating their
values.

Hmm, I will try to do that.

+}
+
/*
* Caller must hold vsync_mutex.
*/
@@ -624,6 +998,8 @@ static int vop_update_plane_event(struct drm_plane *plane,
.y2 = crtc->mode.vdisplay,
};
bool can_position = plane->type != DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY;
+ int min_scale = win->phy->scl ? 0x02000 : DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;
+ int max_scale = win->phy->scl ? 0x80000 : DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING;

Hmm, I wonder if there aren't maybe some helpers to generate fixed
point values in the kernel in a readable way. If not, maybe something
like this would do:

#define FRAC_16_16(mult, div) (((mult) << 16) / (div))

and then you would just use

FRAC_16_16(1, 8) and FRAC_16_16(8, 1) for min and max scale respectively.

OK.

if (drm_format_num_planes(fb->pixel_format) > 2) {
DRM_ERROR("unsupport more than 2 plane format[%08x]\n",
@@ -633,8 +1009,8 @@ static int vop_update_plane_event(struct drm_plane *plane,

ret = drm_plane_helper_check_update(plane, crtc, fb,
&src, &dest, &clip,
- DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
- DRM_PLANE_HELPER_NO_SCALING,
+ min_scale,
+ max_scale,
can_position, false, &visible);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -732,9 +1108,18 @@ static int vop_update_plane_event(struct drm_plane *plane,
VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, uv_vir, uv_vir_stride);
VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, uv_mst, uv_mst);
}
+
+ if (win->phy->scl)
+ _vop_cal_scl_fac(vop, win, actual_w, actual_h,
+ dest.x2 - dest.x1, dest.y2 - dest.y1,
+ fb->pixel_format);

Maybe the function could be named "vop_init_scaler()".

+
val = (actual_h - 1) << 16;
val |= (actual_w - 1) & 0xffff;
VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, act_info, val);
+
+ val = (dest.y2 - dest.y1 - 1) << 16;
+ val |= (dest.x2 - dest.x1 - 1) & 0xffff;
VOP_WIN_SET(vop, win, dsp_info, val);
val = (dsp_sty - 1) << 16;
val |= (dsp_stx - 1) & 0xffff;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
index 63e9b3a..edacdee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_vop.h
@@ -198,4 +198,100 @@ enum factor_mode {
ALPHA_SRC_GLOBAL,
};

+enum scale_mode {
+ SCALE_NONE = 0x0,
+ SCALE_UP = 0x1,
+ SCALE_DOWN = 0x2
+};
+
+enum lb_mode {
+ LB_YUV_3840X5 = 0x0,
+ LB_YUV_2560X8 = 0x1,
+ LB_RGB_3840X2 = 0x2,
+ LB_RGB_2560X4 = 0x3,
+ LB_RGB_1920X5 = 0x4,
+ LB_RGB_1280X8 = 0x5
+};
+
+enum sacle_up_mode {
+ SCALE_UP_BIL = 0x0,
+ SCALE_UP_BIC = 0x1
+};
+
+enum scale_down_mode {
+ SCALE_DOWN_BIL = 0x0,
+ SCALE_DOWN_AVG = 0x1
+};
+
+#define CUBIC_PRECISE 0
+#define CUBIC_SPLINE 1
+#define CUBIC_CATROM 2
+#define CUBIC_MITCHELL 3
+
+#define CUBIC_MODE_SELETION CUBIC_PRECISE
+
+#define SCL_FT_BILI_DN_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 12
+#define SCL_FT_BILI_DN_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x)*(1 << SCL_FT_BILI_DN_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))

static inline

+
+#define SCL_FT_BILI_UP_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 16
+
+#define SCL_FT_AVRG_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 16
+#define SCL_FT_AVRG_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x) * (1 << SCL_FT_AVRG_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))

static inline

+
+#define SCL_FT_BIC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 16
+#define SCL_FT_BIC_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x)*(1 << SCL_FT_BIC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))

static inline

+
+#define SCL_FT_DEFAULT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 12
+#define SCL_FT_VSDBIL_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 12
+
+#define SCL_CAL(src, dst, shift) \
+ ((((src) * 2 - 3) << ((shift) - 1)) / ((dst) - 1))
+#define GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN(src, dst) \
+ SCL_CAL(src, dst, SCL_FT_BILI_DN_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)
+#define GET_SCL_FT_BILI_UP(src, dst) \
+ SCL_CAL(src, dst, SCL_FT_BILI_UP_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)
+#define GET_SCL_FT_BIC(src, dst) \
+ SCL_CAL(src, dst, SCL_FT_BIC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)
+
+#define GET_SCL_DN_ACT_HEIGHT(src_h, vdmult) \
+ (((src_h) + (vdmult) - 1) / (vdmult))

All of the function macros above: static inline.

+
+#define MIN_SCL_FT_AFTER_VSKIP 1
+#define GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN_VSKIP(src_h, dst_h, vdmult) \
+ ((GET_SCL_DN_ACT_HEIGHT((src_h), (vdmult)) == (dst_h)) \
+ ? (GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN((src_h), (dst_h))/(vdmult)) \
+ : GET_SCL_FT_BILI_DN(GET_SCL_DN_ACT_HEIGHT((src_h), \
+ (vdmult)), (dst_h)))

Static inline.

+
+#define GET_SCL_FT_AVRG(src, dst) \
+ (((dst) << ((SCL_FT_AVRG_FIXPOINT_SHIFT) + 1)) \
+ / (2 * (src) - 1))

Static inline.

+
+#define SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 16
+#define SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_ONE (1 << SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)
+#define SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x)*(1 << SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))
+#define SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_REVERT(x) \
+ ((((x) >> (SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT-1)) + 1) >> 1)
+
+#define SCL_GET_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT(scale, shift) \
+ ((scale) << (SCL_COOR_ACC_FIXPOINT_SHIFT - (shift)))
+#define SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 8
+#define SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_ONE (1 << SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)
+#define SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x) * (1 << SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))
+#define SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_REVERT(x) \
+ ((((x) >> (SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT - 1)) + 1) >> 1)
+
+#define SCL_GET_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT(ca, shift) \
+ (((ca) >> ((shift)-SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)) & \
+ (SCL_FILTER_FT_FIXPOINT_ONE - 1))
+
+#define SCL_OFFSET_FIXPOINT_SHIFT 8
+#define SCL_OFFSET_FIXPOINT(x) \
+ ((INT32)((x) * (1 << SCL_OFFSET_FIXPOINT_SHIFT)))

All of the function macros above: static inline. This should also let
you remove the casts.

what the "casts" mean? Why do you thinking that "static inline" is better than "#define"?

Best regards,
Tomasz

--
ïark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Paul Bolle: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] kconfig: allow use of relations other than (in)equality"
Previous message: cee1: "Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1"
In reply to: Tomasz Figa: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale"
Next in thread: Tomasz Figa: "Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]